Thursday June 5th 2008
Topic of Toronto: The Gardiner
It’s been a topic of Toronto for years: Should the Gardiner come down or not?
Personally, I think that the Gardiner is not only a landmark of Toronto, but it is also extremely valuable to Toronto as a means of transportation. There are some that say that it is ugly, or a barrier from the waterfront. Well, it’s a HIGHWAY. It’s not meant to look pretty, it’s meant to be practical and functional. It is also NOT a barrier to the waterfront; the actual barrier to Toronto’s waterfront is what my Father calls the “Berlin Wall of Condos”.
The Gardiner handles TONS of traffic each and every day, and that is not including Lake Shore Boulevard which runs below it for at least 2/3rds of it’s length. To bring down such an artery of traffic into Toronto only cause the city to suffer a mild heart attack, in terms of this analogy. Traffic would be snarled up all the way back West to where the QEW and the 427 meet up. The DVP would become what previously was just a nickname during rush hour: The Don Valley Parking Lot. All the roads that took the traffic from the exits prior to reaching the Gardiner would be flooded, and the lines to get off at those exits would stretch for at least a kilometer. Essentially, traffic within Toronto, which is already congested as it is, would become worse, and road rage would increase. All because David Miller has been brainwashed by the condo development companies into thinking that bringing down the Gardiner is the best way to develop more of the waterfront.
But, with all this said, something has to be done about the traffic situation on the Gardiner. On it’s busiest day, the Gardiner is usually at a standstill. It can’t be expanded, as all those condos now line to each side. Putting the Gardiner underground is the next best option, but in our politicians’ minds, that would require bringing the Gardiner down before anything could be done. Far be it for them to ever consider digging a new tunnel UNDER the Gardiner, which would make the most sense (if they can dig under the English Channel, I’m betting that digging under the Gardiner would be a tad easier). They focus on the costs of such a project, which is well beyond what they’re willing to commit to; it’s much easier, and cheaper, to piss everyone off by bringing down a highway, than to tunnel under it, and slowly transition between the two. Wake up guys: Sometimes, the cheapest alternative isn’t necessarily the best one. I’d be willing to pay more taxes for such a project.
Anyway, enough ranting.
Owen let me know that I apparently sent a letter to the Toronto Star with regards to this very issue. I must say, I sound quite articulate:
The wisdom of removing a section of the Gardiner Expressway must be evaluated by its concrete benefits and drawbacks. The abstract claim of “removing a barrier” ignores the roughly 10 lanes of pedestrian-level traffic that a grand boulevard would create.
We must ask ourselves: How is the Gardiner a barrier and how does removing it remove that barrier? A close examination will reveal that traffic and multi-stage crossings on Lake Shore Blvd. are the true barriers to waterfront access.
Evan Roberts, Toronto
Not bad, eh?
Thing is, while I told Owen that, yes, I submitted that letter (hey, I was bring praised about my vocabulary!), I must confess: It wasn’t me. Looks like there is another “Evan Roberts” residing in Toronto who seems to be on top of current events as well, yet appears to have been educated at a better school than I. I’d like to think that I can be as eloquent as that other Evan Roberts, but alas, my blog speaks for itself.
However, I’m sure that this other Evan Roberts and I have the same stance when it comes to the Gardiner; bringing it down is not the most viable option when it comes to dealing with this issue.